ARCHIDEX 08
This is the exhibition which made me lose 2kg in 4 days. And, this time, its gonna b a bit different as the clients r no longer business-minded home décor industry players that emphasize on increasing on-site sales volume in homedec or eccentric scientist/inventors/scholars that stressed the importance of their title wiv the dr. or ir. B4 their names in ITEX.
4 this round, its gonna b those arrogant group of ppl who labelled themselves as professionals, such as architects, interior designers, developers, qs, and the list goes on. N so, I’ve been forewarned the way they work and their expectations on others at work. It doesn’t comes ez wen they (ok la, 2 b fair, not all r like tat, but so far it’s the majority, which include their exec/secretaries) r impatient plus they expect ppl who r not in their group 2 serve them from head 2 toe, and, surprisingly, they r similar 2 ppl who work in the fine arts, of which they r highly emotional.
Being highly educated (oh-uh, I just can’t stop grinning!) does not give one the right 2 b superior in the society. It just reminded me of some lecturers that I hv met or known personally. No matter how enjoyable it was 2 b in their lecture, at the end of the day, I always felt some r hardly approachable. they always put themselves in the group which is not categorised under public, although it was said tat scholars work closely wiv the public. This is again, my own stereotype.
So, wen there r ppl who r not willing 2 follow instructions just bcos they claimed themselves as ceos/principals/renowned personnel that shud deserve better services as compared 2 others, I always review my definition on professionals & what professionalism is all about.
Perhaps, it was my fault. I shud hv known that they, r humans aft all.
Just that I can’t help 2 feel disappointed wen differentiation of class exist, even in the minds of ppl who r highly educated.
4 this round, its gonna b those arrogant group of ppl who labelled themselves as professionals, such as architects, interior designers, developers, qs, and the list goes on. N so, I’ve been forewarned the way they work and their expectations on others at work. It doesn’t comes ez wen they (ok la, 2 b fair, not all r like tat, but so far it’s the majority, which include their exec/secretaries) r impatient plus they expect ppl who r not in their group 2 serve them from head 2 toe, and, surprisingly, they r similar 2 ppl who work in the fine arts, of which they r highly emotional.
Being highly educated (oh-uh, I just can’t stop grinning!) does not give one the right 2 b superior in the society. It just reminded me of some lecturers that I hv met or known personally. No matter how enjoyable it was 2 b in their lecture, at the end of the day, I always felt some r hardly approachable. they always put themselves in the group which is not categorised under public, although it was said tat scholars work closely wiv the public. This is again, my own stereotype.
So, wen there r ppl who r not willing 2 follow instructions just bcos they claimed themselves as ceos/principals/renowned personnel that shud deserve better services as compared 2 others, I always review my definition on professionals & what professionalism is all about.
Perhaps, it was my fault. I shud hv known that they, r humans aft all.
Just that I can’t help 2 feel disappointed wen differentiation of class exist, even in the minds of ppl who r highly educated.
posted by annie_lal at 6:55 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home